Search for: "STATE, EX REL. v. Barnes"
Results 21 - 40
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirements; Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am
Minnesota ex rel. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
However, feedlots, sale barns, grain elevators and feed mills are not exempt. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Barnes, 14-395, follows close behind with six relists. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Barnes 14-395Issue: Whether the Fourth Circuit contravened 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
Barnes, 14-395, is close behind with five relists. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Barnes, 14-395, involving jurors receiving third-party religious advice on the death penalty, earned its fourth relist. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Barnes, 14-395, a state-on-top habeas case involving jurors who received third-party religious advice on the death penalty, asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Barnes, 14-395, is a state-on-top habeas case involving jurors in separate criminal cases who received religious advice on the death penalty from third parties. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
Casey regardless of the geographical availability of abortion services in adjoining states in light of the equal protection principle articulated in Missouri ex rel. [read post]
