Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am
The Court of Appeal overturned [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
” When the case returned to the state court, the court of criminal appeals again denied relief, explaining that the state’s position on certiorari “add[s] nothing to what we were already aware of when we [previously] denied relief. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Kentucky ex rel. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:25 pm
”) United States ex rel. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
For example, in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:46 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:15 am
State ex rel. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
" K.A. ex rel. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:01 pm
The court granted a non-molestation order ex parte but refused an occupation order and observed that the wife could apply for the transfer of the tenancy. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
That is, after all, what the text of the Impeachment Clause actually states. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm
As depicted in the chart below, Appellant also offers citations that have potentially real case names – presumably the product of algorithmic serendipity – but do not stand for the propositions asserted by Appellant, such as State ex rel. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
Alabama ex rel. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
