Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF B. J. and J. J." Results 21 - 40 of 4,620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 6:53 am by Guest Author
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the Commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]
Thus, no deemed interest should apply to such a Shareholder Loan by virtue of the exception in paragraph 80.4(3)(b). [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:53 am by Alison Brill
Under the Rules of Evidence, the recordings were admissible as statements against penal interest, Rule 804(b)(3) – braggadocio that inculpated the speakers as well as other co-defendants. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:40 am
("J&J") in the Eastern District of Texas, J&J moved to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 2:21 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
That sounds confusing since this is a federal tax issue, but what it means is that you look to state law to determine your ownership interest. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:15 am by Benjamin Wittes
Yet contemplating the Washington Post’s revelation that the Department of Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis (DHS I&A) issued two intelligence reports about tweets I had written, I can’t help but think that this is what J. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
English: Lot of houses for sale due to mortgage crisis, 2008 (Photo credit: Wikipedia) J is for Junk Fees. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:20 am by David S. Jones
The Conrad State 30 Program, also known as the J-1 Visa Waiver program, was enacted in 1994 as a national initiative that permits states to recommend visa waivers for physicians recruited to care for patients in rural and underserved areas. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Hence, the applicant cannot derive any claims if this communication is either not sent (see J 12/84) or not sent to the correct addressee. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:21 am
Kaplan, J., adjudicating him neglected and denying his motion for a best interest finding. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
IPO registration statements and noted that Chairman Jay Clayton stated at CII’s Spring 2018 meeting that this policy should not be changed without input from all interested constituents. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:54 am
timeline summarizing the major events:The Examining Division (ED) simultaneously issued (a) a decision pursuant to R 89 EPC 1973 and (b) an interlocutory revision decision pursuant to A 109(1) EPC 1973, both decisions relating to the decision to grant. [10] The question is then, what was the effect of these actions with respect to the issue of whether the (parent) application remained pending within the meaning of R 25(1) EPC 1973 ? [read post]