Search for: "STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff, vs. IOWA"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
Congressman Bruce Braley (D-IA) seems to have eked-out a victory, fighting off a huge onslaught of corporate money to win reelection in Iowa (although his opponent still won't concede). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Ticket Inadvertently Destroyed - Karafa vs New Jersey State Lottery – 324 A.2d 97 (New Jersey, 1974) – Here we have John Karafa as plaintiff who the facts in the opinion state claimed to be the June 24, 1971 $50,000 winner. [read post]
9 May 2022, 9:37 am
Generally, to state a claim for tortious interference with a contract, a plaintiff must prove the following: (1) a contract; (2) the defendant’s knowledge of the contract; (3) a breach induced or caused by the defendant’s intentional and improper interference; and (4) damages. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 10:08 am
Like an Iowan is from Iowa, or a Californian is from California (but not like a Hoosier is from Indiana). [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 7:32 am
Benefit vs. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:55 am
That’s the same general principle of Erie federalism, extended to the state vs. state context as some form of comity.Not only that, but Gianvito actually cited something for the proposition. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 7:12 am
In 2016, a computer expert hired by the plaintiffs found spreadsheets that used a powerful new gerrymandering tool, based on sophisticated computer modeling. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Here is the state of the docket as of December 27, 2017 in the Leandra English vs Donald Trump and Mick Mulvaney injunction suit (docketed as a declaratory judgment action). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Here is the state of the docket as of December 27, 2017 in the Leandra English vs Donald Trump and Mick Mulvaney injunction suit (docketed as a declaratory judgment action). [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
Servs, No. 08-441ADEA/Must a plaintiff present direct evidence of discrimination in order to obtain a mixed-motive instruction in a non-Title VII discrimination case? [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:31 pm
Cera has already indicated that if his firm should prevail in this matter, that he would like to pursue the same litigation in numerous other states including Texas, New York, Arizona, Wisconsin, Oklahoma and Iowa. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 2:53 pm
Pennsylvania (where there was no real harm to the plaintiff state at all, other than dissatisfaction about the defeat of their preferred candidate in the election) and much more certain than in Trump v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Amelia County Sheriff's Office7th Cir.o Muslim Associate States Cause of Action Against Large Law Firm For Post 9-11 DiscriminationHasan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:28 am
Iowa 2007). [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 6:18 am
Benefit vs. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 10:19 am
., drug vs. medical device; on- vs. off-label use; recall vs. no recall) should provide a pretty good sample of what's out there. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:43 pm
Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Follow Ups Gaga / Madonna Tolkien estate vs. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
>> Plaintiff Bears the Ultimate Burden of Proving Retaliatory MotiveSunderman v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
On the plaintiff's end, the owners of the underlying copyrights in the musical compositions are not involved in the case; neither are many smaller record companies. [read post]
