Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. S.D."
Results 21 - 40
of 198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
S.D., App. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:36 pm
Ed. 2d 647 (1984), and adopted in State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
The case discussing preemption is unreported and not binding on any other New Jersey court, SCS Healthcare Marketing, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:11 am
May 8, 2009) State of New Jersey v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
S.D. [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:47 am
The appellate court cites other decisions by the District of New Jersey which found standing under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act where plaintiff alleged “financial injuries based on their purchase of a product that did not have the attributes it claimed. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:24 am
S.D., App. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:30 am
That’s because a number of current and former NFL cheerleaders have filed lawsuits in Florida, New Jersey, New York, California and other states for violations of state and federal wage and hour laws, including the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
” Wipf v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 8:00 am
” Wipf v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:35 am
Now, the federal district court in New Jersey has similarly rejected class certification in two consolidated suits in which state residents argued that DuPont should pay for a medical monitoring program because their drinking water was allegedly contaminated with a Teflon-related chemical. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Where such rulings were broad enough, they tended to create legislative backlash, as happened in New Jersey. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
’” State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:23 am
In State of New Jersey v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:36 am
In fact, they said New Jersey law should control all of the potentially hundreds of thousands of class members’ claims and recoveries throughout the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 12:09 pm
—Carl Sagan 1Grablow v New Jersey Manufacturers Ins. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 7:45 am
Thus, he analyzed the state consumer protection statute claim solely under New Jersey's statute. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 12:53 pm
District Courts in New Jersey has not yet weighed in on this subject, but it appears likely that they will follow the trend. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
As fate might have it, the question of market share liability in New Jersey was governed by a case, Shackil v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:04 am
The New Jersey analysis was similar, though New Jersey doesn’t require reliance for recovery, only causation. [read post]
