Search for: "STATE V. HALPERN"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
” Mosher-Simons v County of Allegany, 99 NY2d 214, 219 (2002), quoting Tarfer v State oflVew York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 (1986). [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
Halpern, Craig Allen Nard and Kenneth L. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
• Discuss potential approaches to address identified evidentiary gaps.Session Chair: Scott Halpern 1:15 p.m. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:40 am
, 112 N.J. 30, 548 A.2d 188 (1988) Halpern v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Jeremy gives the floor to Nick Briggs and Kerry Russell (Shakespeares), who report on 118 Data Resource Limited v IDS Data Services Limited and others [2014] EWHC 3629 (Ch), a High Court, England and Wales, ruling of Deputy Judge David Halpern QC, in which they represented the defendants. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Several lobbying efforts were made, including by Attorneys Max Halpern and John Michael Montevideo of Gomez Trial Attorneys. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Its legality, along with the legality of many other same-sex marriages, was affirmed by the Ontario Court of Appeal on June 10, 2003 in a case called Halpern v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
Kaufman v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:49 pm
Section 512(d) deals with information tools. 17 U.S.C.A § 512(d) (1998).2 Jakob Halpern, Finding a Safe Harbor, 189 N.J.L.J. 1082, 1083 (2007).3 Id.4 Jakob Halpern, supra note 2, at 1084.5 Id.6 See Field v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Dr Joseph Fesenmair (Bird & Bird, Munich) then gave an explanation of the Court of Justice of the European Union's ruling last year in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:34 pm
The petitioners in the Halpern v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
On the same day Mrs Justice Gloster made a Norwich Pharmacal order in the case of Halpern v Google. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
For example, the court in Zoom Imaging Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
The 2006 amendment preempts state and federal dilution actions against federally registered marks, which also helps big TM owners. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 1:00 am
At §24, Neuberger J points us towards Secretary of State for Trade and Industry –v- Langridge [1991] Ch. 402, where Balcombe LJ provided a four-question approach: What is the scope and purpose of the Act? [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
Halpern, editor and contributing author. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
Halpern, Craig Allen Nard, Kenneth L. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am
Rino v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am
Rino v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:47 am
My response invoked Cincinnati v. [read post]
