Search for: "STATE v ENGLISH" Results 21 - 40 of 7,311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
For example, in the English case of Boys v Chaplin, the House of Lords was unable to provide a coherent ratio decidendi due to differing opinions regarding the law applicable to torts when applying English law to heads of damages. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On 15 May 2024, the UK Supreme Court delivered a significant judgment in the case RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV,[1] addressing the modern approach to be taken to FMCs under English law, as well as taking the opportunity to examine the relationship between concepts of autonomy and certainty of contract on the one hand, and what might have been seen as commercial pragmatism on the other. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am by itars sis
In addition, the State is responsible for the protection of cultural and natural heritage and the harmonious development of culture in Slovenia.[17] This Article is linked to Article 73 of the Constitution, which states that everyone has a duty to protect cultural monuments. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 am by Tobin Admin
Accordingly, the Court of Appeals affirmed the state court’s grant of the motion on the claims against the police officer’s individual capacity as he was entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am by Chukwuma Okoli
This article considers the position as to proof of foreign law in the English courts in light of the case of FS Nile Plaza v Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45 and the 11th edition of the Commercial Court Guide. [read post]
30 May 2024, 5:00 am by Francion Brooks (Bristows)
Indeed, he had shortly before accepted some similar arguments in refusing an application for a declaration that a particular form of interim licence agreement would be FRAND in Lenovo v InterDigital ((2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)). [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:48 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
The court has also stated that the very purpose of the formal requirements imposed by Article 17 (now Article 25 of Brussels Ia) is to ensure that consensus between the parties is in fact established (Case 313/85 Iveco Fiat v Van Hool EU:C:1986:423, [5]). [read post]