Search for: "STATE v JELLE" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2007, 1:16 am
"I don't say that merely because the state Supreme Court leaves out some of the details of Dr. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Humphreys J stated that there had been “no debate around the issue of the public interest, relevant to the anonymity of suspects, nor any consideration of the need for a fair balance of rights. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:15 am by Steven M. Gursten
Dairyland Insurance contested wage loss benefits – while at the same time  proving the auto accident victim was entitled… In Grays v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]