Search for: "STATE v JELLE" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:39 am
_trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.ca1.uscourts.gov');">Noonan v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
For the following reasons, we affirm. 08a0300p.06 2008/08/18 Jells v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:17 am
In a separate ruling Thursday involving two joined cases, Matter of Adult Home at Erie Station, 21, and Regional Economic Community Action Program v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:16 am
"I don't say that merely because the state Supreme Court leaves out some of the details of Dr. [read post]