Search for: "STATE v MONTANA POWER CO" Results 21 - 40 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 4:31 pm by Will Baude
Later discussions of doing-business jurisdiction in fact referred to a preexisting standard for state personal jurisdiction, established well before International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 3:08 pm by Ilya Somin
The anti-commandeering doctrine originated in the 1842 Supreme Court case Prigg v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Well, state court judges are savvy and powerful people. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
The tribe contends that tribal court authority over civil torts involving non-Indians has always existed and is co-extensive with the rules set forth in Montana. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:51 pm by David Kopel
Rather, it is a recital, designed to inform the reader of two legal default rules: First, that express grants of enumerated powers, stated elsewhere, carry with them subsidiary incidental powers (“necessary”). [read post]
In fact, a Montana polygamist, Nathan Collier, has applied for a marriage license with his second “wife. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am by Edith Roberts
The second case this morning is Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in  Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
PerDiemCo LLC reads like my recent Civil Procedure final exam.[1]  The topic is personal jurisdiction–when may a Federal Court exercise its power over an out-of-state patentee in a declaratory judgment action challenging the patent’s validity. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Cale Jaffe
Will state-centric environmentalism have some staying power? [read post]