Search for: "STATE v. AMARAL" Results 21 - 40 of 636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets "Officers of the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Steven Calabresi] Trump v. Anderson, Professor Akhil Reed Amar, and the Constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm by Steven Calabresi
Term Limits v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] All Blackman-Tillman Articles, Presentations, Amicus Briefs, Commentary, and Blog posts on Section 3 and Insurrection
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Tillman in the Times: "A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election"
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Josh Blackman
"] Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Look Away: How the Supreme Court Could Set Aside Trump’s Disqualification for Insurrection under the Fourteenth Amendment
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Kurt Lash] Section Three and the "First Insurrection" … That Wasn't
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson: Introduction
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am by Marty Lederman
A week from Thursday, on February 8, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 23-179, Trump v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Rebel Yell: Why a Civil War Amendment Has Donald Trump Fighting to Keep His Name on the Presidential Ballot
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Steven Calabresi] Nikki Haley and Donald Trump
24 Jan 2024, 11:18 pm by Steven Calabresi
 The Amar brothers think a Democratic President of the Senate and a Democratic majority in the House are not bound by the Republican Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Louisville Daily Journal (April 1868): The President is not an "Officer of the United States"
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Reflections on the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Recent Invalidation of Non-Contiguous State Legislative District Lines, With Special Attention to the Ruling’s Relevance, If Any, to the Independent State Legislature Theory
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court’s June ruling in Moore v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Another Bad Argument Against the Application of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to President Trump: Part Two of a Two-Part Series
26 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(I put that aside because I don’t think state-court judges that represent the people of a single state should be able to remove candidates for national office under a provision of the U.S. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Will the Supreme Court's Conservative Super-Majority Make their Patrons Untaxable?
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  By invoking a later Lochner-era case, Eisner v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
[Steven Calabresi] Chief Justice Roberts' Chance to Redeem Himself!
3 Dec 2023, 11:48 am by Steven Calabresi
 That is wrong for the reasons I spelled out in my post on the Volokh Conspiracy last night responding to Professors Akhil Reed Amar and Vikram Amar. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Jim Lindgren] Steve Calabresi: The Amar Brief in Moore Should Not Be Embraced: Part 2
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
Second, Alexander Hamilton himself said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Is the Indirect-Tax Argument Forfeited in Moore v. United States?, by Ben Silver
1 Dec 2023, 4:34 am by Guest Author
”) In Pollock v. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
How Important is the Eighth Circuit’s Recent Ruling that the Voting Rights Act Does Not Contain a Private Right of Action? Section 1983 and Ex Parte Young as Workarounds
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Case v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/