Search for: "STATE v. CARTIER"
Results 21 - 40
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
.* When its comes to "deadwood", leave it in the State of South Dakota and out of Trademark Office policyIs unused "deadwood"really cluttering up trade mark registers? [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:58 am
Even more, the Court - similarly as the Austrian Supreme Court in UPC Telekabel and the English High Court in Cartier v Sky - recognized that the availability of this remedy is compulsory under Art. 8(3) InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:20 am
We can now confirm the full agenda and part of the line-up, as follows:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “The fragile state of relations between service providers and brand owners: life after the UK Supreme Court decision in Cartier v Sky”Moderator: Eleonora Rosati(University of Southampton and JIPLP Co-Editor)Confirmed Panellists: Catherine Palmer(Legal Director at… [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
Be that as it may, here's Tim's take on what Arnold J's decision has achieved, how they go about dealing with the same phenomenon in the United States -- and where we might go from here:Richemont v BskyB and others: a national solution to a global problem? [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
Lord Justice Arnold recapped the current position in England and Wales with regards to website-blocking, noting 20th Century Fox v BT (Newzbin 2) wherein he granted the first such injunction in 2011, and the first application and injunction in relation to trade marks in Cartier v Sky. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
This equitable jurisdiction was confirmed by the UKSC in Cartier International AG v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
A nice surprise for Cartier and friendsCan injunctions (particularly: blocking injunctions) be issued against intermediaries in trade mark cases, even lacking in the UK a specific implementation of the third sentence in Article 11 of the Enforcement Directive? [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm
The Court considered the recent analysis of the English High Court’s power to grant injunctions in the case of Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Limited ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch))(see our discussion here). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
In Case Nintendo v PC Box C-355/12 [Kat Posts here], the CJEU explained that Art 6 is to be interpreted broadly and "includes application of an access control or protection process, such as encryption, scrambling or other transformation of the work". [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:41 am
| Brussels court in FN Herstal v Heckler & Koch wrestles with combination invention v mere aggregation of features | Brexit: requests to Govt from IP professional bodies | Street heart: urban murals as common goods | Have your say on the UK implementation of the EUPortability Regulation: public consultation now open! [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
In Norwich, this was characterized as a duty to assist the person wronged (p. 175; Cartier International AG v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
The complaints relate to allegations about Mr Topić’s previous job as Director General of the State Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:05 am
Another example considered by Benet regarding the law of intellectual property having unintended consequences is the Supreme Court’s judgement in Cartier v BT. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
* Online enforcement "has a colour and a name": blocking injunctions - A closer look at the Cartier judgment Last Friday the IPKat broke the news of Arnold J’s judgment in Cartier and Others v BskyB and Others, a case concerning the possibility of requiring internet service providers (ISPs) to block, or at least impede, access by their subscribers to websites that advertise and sell counterfeit goods. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
* BREAKING NEWS: Cartier and friends score over ISPs: Open Rights Group intervenes Jeremy breaks the news of Mr Justice Arnold of the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice giving his decision in Cartier, Montblanc and Richemont v BSkyB, BT, TalkTalk, EE and Virgin (Open Rights Group intervening) [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch). [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
