Search for: "STATE v. FARR"
Results 21 - 40
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2018, 3:25 pm
In August, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am
There are exceptions such as the “continuing wrong” doctrine discussed in Palmeri v Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 05794 [152 AD3d 457] July 25, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:06 am
Here, plaintiff has presented evidence of a “continuing wrong,” which is “deemed to have accrued on the date of the last wrongful act” (Leonhard v United States, 633 F2d 599, 613 [2d Cir. 1980], cert denied 451 US 908 [1981]; Harvey, 34 AD3d at 364). [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
See Farr v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 3:06 am
In 2016, the Court received an original jurisdiction lawsuit, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:26 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm
Hot Coffee Hot Coffee begins with the notorious Liebeck v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
Felony cases are randomly assigned to the circuit Judges.The Drug Crimes rule also states, "When a [Misdemeanor Drug Crimes] notice to appear, criminal report affidavit, or information is filed, the clerk will assign the case according to the following alphabetical distribution. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Home Office official Charles Farr said in evidence to the Committee: "Future-proofing and flexibility are at the heart of the language we have used in clause 1. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Home Office official Charles Farr said in evidence to the Committee: "Future-proofing and flexibility are at the heart of the language we have used in clause 1. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Home Office official Charles Farr said in evidence to the Committee: "Future-proofing and flexibility are at the heart of the language we have used in clause 1. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm
Last week, the Arizona Court of Appeals heard oral argument in the case White Mountain Health Center v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm
Farr — opened his side of the argument by urging the Court to leave the Nevada v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm
Forty other states plus the Multistate Tax Commission supported Supreme Court review of the Nevada v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 5:50 pm
In a recent decision in State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
”John Thorpe MP put the State firmly ahead of the individual:“… In my view the State is in great danger, and no power which would tend to protect it should be withheld from the Government. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:38 am
Farr in courtroom 303 in the Edgecomb building at 800 E. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
That case is R. v. [read post]
