Search for: "STATE v. GEAR"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
Thus, citing McCall v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:54 am
Brooks v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained "[Firefighter's] injury was the result of an incidental — not accidental — event," referencing Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, because Firefighter's injury was sustained while Firefighter was performing routine duties, not as a result of an unexpected event as the dehydration suffered by Firefighter while running in hot weather in heavy gear was a foreseeable risk of the firefighting training exercise. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained "[Firefighter's] injury was the result of an incidental — not accidental — event," referencing Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, because Firefighter's injury was sustained while Firefighter was performing routine duties, not as a result of an unexpected event as the dehydration suffered by Firefighter while running in hot weather in heavy gear was a foreseeable risk of the firefighting training exercise. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:05 am
The case is entitled Tyger v Precision Drilling Corp LLC and issued from the Third Circuit. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:12 pm
Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 12:24 pm
See New State Ice Co v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:59 am
Williams v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
We are gearing up for the first Republican debates to be held here on August 23rd. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 3:34 am
Further, FDA has not opined on whether REMS patents can be listed in the Orange Book (though the FTC did not mince words in saying that such listings were anticompetitive in the Jazz v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
Because the new statute does not include the procedural protections present in the federal pretrial detention statute upheld in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 9:31 am
Case Study: Cazar v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
The system is geared to make money off of people. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Since Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 11:41 am
Introduction With its decision in Adolph v. [read post]