Search for: "STATE v. MARQUES"
Results 21 - 40
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
He says it states quite clearly at the top in big letters “Business Equipment Maintenance Agreement”, and that there is no way it can be mistaken for an invoice. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:59 pm
The case is Bruce McCandless v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
The facts may be familiar to some readers of this blog and of MARQUES's Class 46, but here they are again. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:49 pm
[Post by Venkat] United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:09 am
Which way next for Nokia v Daimler? [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am
Fernandez Marques, Pfizer Gmbh (Germany) Christopher Hanes, GlaxoSmithKline (United States) Branding clinical trials: benefits in making the physician like the drug/recall it later. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 1:49 pm
See Diamond Hong, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 1:20 pm
The CJEU ruled, as a criterion to determine whether the prices are unfair, the comparison of the rates “with those applicable in neighbouring Member States as well as with those applicable in other Member States adjusted in accordance with the PPP [purchasing power parity] index”. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm
Background and analysis of the Judgment are provided by Comparative Patent Remedies.In the United States, there is a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Moving to trademarks, the blog also covered the INTA announcement about the opening in 2017 of the Latin America representative office in Santiago (Chile).Over at MARQUES Class 46, the blog discusses the judgment in the Gucci v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 5:22 am
"We own the weekend", states this jocular tale of trade mark proprietorship. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:48 am
Come to the MARQUES sub-forum! [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
” Gunter argued that the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Perfect 10 v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:46 am
La Marque, 2021 WL 1997376 (D. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:11 am
On December 14, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Adaptive Streaming Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:48 am
And while the attached judgment in the Florida case [State of Florida v Federated Institute for Patent and Trademark Registry (FIPTR), see also petition for certiorari here] does not count as true research, it is my contention that it gives a snapshot of the kind of impact that such invitations can have and are having. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:29 pm
Here’s how the terrible decision in City of Parma, Ohio v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The celebration of two decades of the House of Lords patent biopatent ruling in Biogen v Medeva, hosted by Rouse, is happily recorded on PatLit by Rouseniks Mary Smillie and Catriona Smith. [read post]
