Search for: "STATE v. MCKENZIE"
Results 21 - 40
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2009, 3:13 pm
McKenzie, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2009] EWHC 1097 (Admin) was a Judicial Review initially brought on grounds that the local authority refused to provide the claimant with temporary accommodation following her notification by the hostel she was living in that she would not be able to remain once her baby was born. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
Four of the defendants are former officers and directors of Ramp Corporation and Xybernaut Corporation, including Martin Weisberg, a former partner at Baker & McKenzie law firm. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:50 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:04 am
In Moreau v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:50 am
Bruska v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Earlier in the week, this Kat had the pleasure of participating in a public debate at the Baker & McKenzie premises in London on whether the Meltwater decision (see IPKat here) "marks the end of browsing as we know it". [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:03 pm
The attorney for the lender, McKenzie Check Advance, contended that Bland's argument was foreclosed by AT&T v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 1:20 pm
The style of the case was Evans v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The SEC stated that “the Commission will hold investment advisers accountable when they do not accurately describe their incorporation of ESG factors into their investment selection process. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:49 am
McKenzie, 202 Ill. 2d 304, 311 (2001). [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 2:11 am
The case, Heiligmann v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:21 pm
Initially, the court resolved the case against the defendant; however, after the states’ high court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 5:26 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 380 (17 April 2008) Manchester City Council v Moran & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 378 (17 April 2008) TRM Copy Centres (UK) Ltd & Ors v Lanwall Services Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 382 (17 April 2008) Duffield & Anor v Gandy [2008] EWCA Civ 379 (17 April 2008) Dunn v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 374 (16 April 2008) A v Essex County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 364… [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 3:26 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) William McKenzie v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
Strong AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 10:00 am
The court also dismissed his claim that Ramadan meals were served as late as possible in retaliation for his arguing about the proper time to serve these meals.In McKenzie v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
