Search for: "STATE v. RIX"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2016, 3:34 pm
Will this warning from Lord Justice Rix hold true following Positec? [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
When such appointments are made in the United States the judicial record of the appointee is subject to minute analysis over many months. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 12:34 am
Per Lord Justice Rix:"I ... wonder whether this case illustrates a powerful but also troubling example of the state exercising its precautionary responsibilities for a much loved child in the face of parenting whose unsatisfactory nature lies not so much in the area of physical abuse but in the more subjective area of moral and emotional risk. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
It would be an undesirable state of affairs if Swindon lost the power to take action against Mr Redpath merely because he had been evicted. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:09 am
In Sherdley & Anr v Nordea Life and Pension SA the Court of Appeal was asked to examine whether the English Court had jurisdiction to try a claim brought by British nationals who were not, at the time proceedings were commenced, resident in the UK. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm
Brown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
That is the issue which the UK Court of Appeal addressed in AES-Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:48 am
That is the issue which the UK Court of Appeal addressed in AES-Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Had they done so, Her Ladyship stated that she would have agreed with the minority decision in that case. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
Lord Justice Rix is driving forward the scheme as part of the Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger’s aim to revitalise the CAMS scheme. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am
Both of these issues were addressed by Washington State Supreme Court in Putman v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:13 am
The High Court decision was overturned by a 2:1 majority on 8 October 2010, with Rix LJ giving the leading judgment in the Court of Appeal decision. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
(See CFTC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
The Board stated that there was an ‘enormous difference’ between an agreement regulating a state of affairs between married couples (a postnup) and an agreement purporting to regulate an uncertain marital future (a prenup). [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:53 pm
And then we have Broomleigh Housing Association Ltd v Okonkwo [2010] EWCA Civ 1113 Mr O was Broomleigh's tenant. [read post]
