Search for: "STATE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CREEK COUNTY"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
The Court similarly rejected plaintiffs’ erosion impact arguments, stating: “Nothing in the record indicates there is a fair argument that placement of the spoils on a two percent grade, at least 100 feet from the creek, covered with straw mulch, and isolated by erosion control measures, will significantly affect water quality in the creek. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
This post examines a recent decision of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:21 pm
Superior Court (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1029.) [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 11:37 am
The creditor also doesn’t need to involve a court to obtain it. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(A135892; nonpublished opinion; San Mateo County Superior Court; CIV508656.) [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:01 pm
After sentencing, Kerkel appealed to the superior court, which affirmed. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
In a decision filed December 2, and later ordered published on December 30, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Mendocino County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a Nonindustrial Timber Management Plan (NTMP) for 615 acres adjacent to Gualala. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
`While this [c]ourt retains its authority to make its own findings of fact, we recognize the superior position of the family court in making credibility determinations.' S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
(A131254; 203 Cal.App.4th 656; Alameda County Superior Court; RG10517314.) [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
(A131254; 203 Cal.App.4th 656; Alameda County Superior Court; RG10517314.) [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The boundary of the resource management plan includes the 11,999 acre specific plan site, and the 1,517-acre Salt Creek conservation area in Ventura County which adjoins the specific plan area to the southeast. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
