Search for: "STATE v. TRAPP"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
Trapp, and Stuart M. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Trapp’s new essay on armed attacks by non-state actors. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:29 pm
Attribution has been insisted on by the International Court of Justice in its decisions in the Nicaragua, Palestinian Wall, and DRC v Uganda cases; Trapp discusses the ICJ’s jurisprudence in some detail. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
Destito had also given Law Vermont State Trooper Andrew Todd's cell phone number. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:37 am
The decision in Anderson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:49 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:48 am
Alex Mills and Kimberley Natasha Trapp (Cambridge University) have posted Smooth Runs the Water Where the Brook is Deep: The Obscured Complexities of Germany v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:56 am
EEOC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:56 am
EEOC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:03 am
Trapp, 77 F.3d 707, 711 (3d Cir. 1996) (“To excuse the absence of a warrant, the burden rests on the State to show the existence of [exigent circumstances]. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am
Oracle, USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:48 pm
The petitioner in Trapp v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
is not a trade mark says the CFI (IPKat) France Evian revamps its bottle with a little joywashing, teams up with designer Paul Smith (Class 99) Second HADOPI law faces constitutionality test by French Socialists (Intellectual Property Watch) Germany Good news for copyright infringers or a Trapp to Tripp designers? [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 5:38 pm
(Full disclosure: I am lead counsel in one of the cases, State v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:32 am
But Harris v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
Scruggs, you have heard the United States Attorney state what evidence he could present against you on this particular charge if the case were to go to trial. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Trapp, 294 S.E.2d 446, 454-56 (W. [read post]
