Search for: "STATE v. VENERABLE" Results 21 - 40 of 503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 8:23 am by LawDiva
Divorce lawyer Marcus Dearle is a partner in the venerable law firm Withers, a firm that began in the United Kingdom in 1896 and now has eight offices throughout Europe, Asia, the United States and the Caribbean. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, for those frustrated with (or openly hostile to) particular elements of the Constitution, such as Article V, brevity has provided a path forward. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 9:50 am by Eric Goldman
. * * * This opinion addresses a venerable issue in Internet Law: can a website control how visitors see its web pages? [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages stated that she was bound by the Court of Appeal’s judgment in R v Registrar General, ex parte Segerdal [1970] 2 QB 697 to reject the appellant’s application to record such a church to marry in, as the authority held that Scientology did not involve “religious worship” since it did not involve “reverence or veneration of God or of a Supreme Being”, but rather instruction in a… [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:25 am by David R. Papke
In the 1983 decision in Lac Court Oreilles Band of Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:03 am by Sheppard Mullin
In 2007, the United States Supreme Court, updating the application of the cumulative advances in antitrust economics as applied to vertical restraint cases, overruled the venerable Dr. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:55 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Can one possibly have genuine respect, let alone "veneration," for a Constitution that is proudly construed to deny Congress the ability to solve a serious national problem? [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:21 am by Peter Margulies
These are not fly-by-night organizations dabbling in refugee assistance: a venerable interfaith volag like USCCB puts its reputation on the line with each and every assurance made at the coordination meeting with State Department officials. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:04 pm
No person who is afflicted with a venereal disease shall marry in this state. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:35 am by SHG
Kansas don’t need no stinkin’ rule, and in Kahler v. [read post]