Search for: "STATE v. YOUNG" Results 21 - 40 of 8,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2015, 1:19 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Robbery, assault and conspiracy to commit robbery After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Derrick Carza Young, appellant, was found guilty of robbery, theft, second-degree assault, and conspiracy to commit robbery. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:16 am
Regina (P) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “A real and immediate risk to life was required to justify a self-harming young man's request that the State investigate treatment he received while detained in a young offenders institution. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:00 am by CivPro Blogger
The abstract states: In 2007, the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm by legalinformatics
Young of the Wayne State University Department of Communication has published The Ghost of Moby-Dick and the Rhetorical Haunting of the Ninth Court’s Anderson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:41 am
R (P) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 701; [2009] WLR (D) 234 “Where it was contended, pursuant to art 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as scheduled to the Human Rights Act 1998, that the state should investigate the treatment accorded to a self-harming young [...] [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:41 am by AdminLaw Blogger
New on SSRN: "Closing the Gap: The Fourth Circuit's Narrowing of the Ex Parte Young Exception in Virginia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am by Leiza Dolghih
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:00 am by Ari Ezra Waldman
On September 9, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey released its opinion in State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:03 am
Regina( C) v Secretary of State for Justice; [2008] WLR (D) 262 “The introduction of an amendment to the Secure Training Centre Rules to permit physical restraint of young offenders in secure training centres to ensure good order and discipline without prior consultation with the Children's Commissioner was unlawful and engaged art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom. [read post]