Search for: "STONE v. DANIELS et al." Results 21 - 23 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Those were all situations in which Republicans should have said, “OK, this is finally too much,” but they never did.All of these examples and more demonstrate that we are not waiting for Trump to change but are instead simply enabling Republicans to run the clock and let people become accustomed to Trump’s new assault on decency and the rule of law.And we should not forget that none of the public statements by Republicans thus far is set in stone. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
First, those opposed to Sotomayor reinforce what Pierre Schlag calls a “grid aesthetic” of American law, where “law is etched in stone” and there is little room for interpretation outside of the “bright-line rules” inscribed in the law. [read post]