Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,492
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
The Keep Your Opinions to Yourself Award: Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita The Failed Sunshine State Award: Florida Gov. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:21 am
The larger point is that we are headed in some strange new places. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:49 am
In Murthy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:13 am
Even if the owner of bonnanwalt was not identical to the lawyer’s employer, it seems quite strange to consider the lawyer sufficiently independent. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Without that grammar, the past becomes suddenly strange and unfamiliar. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:39 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in Great Lakes Insurance SE v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
Don’t Judge a Range by its Cover: Federal Circuit Sides with Patentee on Written Description Support
11 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
Moving to another state clearly does require some kind of action with the court. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
The founding generation was also worried about two other kinds of military threat – armed insurrection against state governments from within or, strange though it may seem to us now, invasions of one state by another state or confederation of states. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
[1] E.g., General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
This seems strange. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
