Search for: "Sackett v. United States Environmental Protection Agency" Results 21 - 40 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2023, 1:46 pm by James J. Scherer
On May 25, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) made its final decision on a long-running case that will redefine the power and authority that the United States Environmental Protection agency (EPA) will have to regulate and protect the navigable waters of the United States (WOTUS). [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am by Paul R. Recupero
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which instructed the Sacketts to stop work because of the presence of wetlands protected by the CWA, which bars the discharge of pollutants, including rocks and sand, into “waters of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am by Paul R. Recupero
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which instructed the Sacketts to stop work because of the presence of wetlands protected by the CWA, which bars the discharge of pollutants, including rocks and sand, into “waters of the United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am by Paul R. Recupero
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which instructed the Sacketts to stop work because of the presence of wetlands protected by the CWA, which bars the discharge of pollutants, including rocks and sand, into “waters of the United States. [read post]
Environmental Protection Agency, narrowing the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulatory authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:18 am by Alan Brackett
Environmental Protection Agency, No. 21-454 (May 25, 2023). [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:18 am by Alan Brackett
Environmental Protection Agency, No. 21-454 (May 25, 2023). [read post]
  Under the Clean Water Act, these agencies have dual regulatory authority to protect “waters of the United States” and “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The Environmental Protection Agency informed the Sacketts that their property contained wetlands and that their backfilling violated the Clean Water Act, which prohibits discharging pollutants into “the waters of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Environmental Protection Agency, the Supreme Court adopted a narrowing interpretation of the scope of federal regulatory authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]