Search for: "Sacramento County Board of Supervisors"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal As Districts Grow More Diverse, Congressional Outreach Does Too MSN – Michael Macagnone (Roll Call) | Published: 9/30/2021 Over the past decade, U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:25 am
Humboldt County Department of Health and Human Services Social Worker Supervisor II, Sacramento, CA. [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:34 pm
For example, on June 30, 2020, the Sacramento City Council voted to require an inspector general “to investigate officer-involved shootings and use-of-force incidents that result in serious bodily injury or death. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:29 pm
City and County of Sacramento. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 1:44 pm
A few weeks ago, he told the Shasta County Board of Supervisors to expect trouble if they enforce Gov. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:01 am
Late last month, however—consistent with the flurry of COVID-19 mandatory paid sick laws across the state—the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors passed the Sacramento County Worker Protection, Health, and Safety Act of 2020. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:01 am
On September 1, 2020, the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance called the “Sacramento County Worker Protection, Health, and Safety Act of 2020,” which contains two major components: (1) employer safety practices and protocols, and (2) supplemental paid sick leave. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Litigation: CEQA; General Plans and Zoning; Clean Water Act; Easements, implied and express dedications; Covenants, conditions, and restrictions; Failure to disclose in real estate transactions; Land use entitlements; Eminent domain and inverse condemnation; Board of Supervisors or City Council land use approvals; AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act; Land use construction defect; and California tribal consultation. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 9:43 am
On August 18, 2020, Sonoma County joined the ranks of ten other California cities and counties that have enacted local supplemental paid sick leave ordinances related to COVID-19.1 The Board of Supervisors voted to approve the Ordinance2 as an urgency ordinance, meaning it became effective immediately and shall sunset on December 31, 2020. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:44 am
Unincorporated San Mateo County Also on July 7, the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors adopted an emergency ordinance to establish supplemental paid sick leave for COVID-19-related reasons, which took effect the following day, on July 8. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal Abrupt Change to Census Deadline Could Result in an Undercount of Latino and Black Communities Philadelphia Inquirer – Jose Del Real and Fredrick Kunkle (Washington Post) | Published: 8/9/2020 Census experts and advocates warn the Trump administration’s decision to end the decennial count a month earlier than expected will result in a dramatic undercount of Black and Latino communities across the country, which could have grave effects on federal funding and… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:15 am
San Mateo County Also, on July 7, San Mateo County’s Board of Supervisors adopted an emergency ordinance to establish supplemental paid sick leave for COVID-19-related reasons, which took effect the following day on July 8, 2020. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:52 am
At the state level there are federal congressional districts, state legislative districts, and board of equalization districts; at the county level, supervisor districts and trustee areas for county boards of education; at the municipal level, city council districts; for school districts and community college districts, trustee areas; and for certain special districts, divisions. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm
Board of Supervisors (1981) 126 Cal.App.3d 698, 702-703, 708.) [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Weeks after the law was passed, a Boeing 737 Max jet crashed off the coast of Indonesia, killing everyone on board. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
County’s MND for the project evolved over time, and the project was significantly modified in response to early environmental comments and concerns expressed by plaintiffs during County’s administrative approval proceedings (e.g., to reduce water demand, not increase net on-site groundwater use, develop a plan for cave spoils); thus, while County’s Board of Zoning Adjustments initially approved the use permit with a 2015 MND, a revised 2016 MND… [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
State Water Resources Control Board and San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board Amicus Brief Waters of the State Rulemaking Proceedings Pending Amendments to Riverside County Mining Ordinance Point San Pedro Road Coalition v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal At the Bedraggled FEC, a Clean Slate of Leaders? [read post]
