Search for: "Said v. Clinton"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
As Andy McCarthy put it in The National Review, If lawmakers intended the PRA to modify the Espionage Act such that presidents were immune from the latter, they would have said so. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
SPITZER v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:14 pm
"Here," she said, "I am paraphrasing Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 7:51 am
A few weeks ago, an adviser to the Hillary Clinton campaign claimed that Clinton believes the Supreme Court’s decision in D.C. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:18 am
Some mid- to late-1800s cases also define eligible as referring to “capacity of holding, as well as capacity of being elected to an office” (see Carson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 12:45 pm
We've seen the hard way in the Citizens United case and campaign finance and in Bush v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 5:32 am
Citation: Jones v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 5:31 am
Citation: Jones v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:21 am
In Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Everybody laughed (and/or cringed) when President Clinton said: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is" is. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:31 am
I posted that clip yesterday and said "the words scarcely matter. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 6:04 pm
Thompson has obtained two oaths said to be executed by Judge Tunis and he alleges that one of them is forged and not her signature.Mr. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:18 am
Employer rejects hearing officer's dismissal of two of three charges of misconduct, finding employee guilty of all chargesMatter of Thibodeau v Northeastern Clinton Cent. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:49 pm
Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:50 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:40 am
The Appellate Division says Clinton v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:03 am
Case Citation: Hughes v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
RFRA was a reaction to the 1990 case Employment Division v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 2:03 pm
[Instapundit] * If the justice(s) Trump appoints to SCOTUS end up overturning Roe v. [read post]
