Search for: "Salas v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2009, 4:04 am
Appointing authority not required to give its former employee a reason for denying his or her application for reinstatementSalas v New York City Police Dept., 2009 NY Slip Op 04705, Decided on June 9, 2009, Appellate Division, First DepartmentEddie Salas a New York City police officer, resigned from his position on the eve of a departmental hearing scheduled to address allegations that he refused to obey a superior's order to arrest a sleeping homeless person. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:15 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 200612, Aug. 27, 2018) and dismissed a Native American inmate's complaint regarding confiscation and destruction of his religious property.In Salas v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:59 am by Howard Friedman
County of York, (3d Cir., July 25, 2016), the 3rd Circuit (via a footnote) affirmed dismissal of an inmate's complaint that a package containing a Bible was initially rejected as overweight.In Salas v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 12:10 pm
A couple recent articles from Law.com:'These Schools of Interpretation Are Folderol': State Chief Justices Discuss How They Analyze the LawHow appellate analytics give law firms a competitive edgeCLA's recent video program on the famous Mendez v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:32 pm by Ted Folkman
But it’s not clear that Ecuador, rather than the US, is the outlier here: in InvestorsHub.com v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Salas (AT)For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: 855-79 LLC v Salas (AD) [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am by ASAD KHAN
However, art 51 limits the CFR’s application to “only when” member states “are implementing Union Law”. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:24 am by Harriet Pearson
A New Jersey federal judge yesterday issued the much-anticipated opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am by Aimee Denholm
On the question of jurisdiction, it was held that Sala v SSHD [2016] UKUT 411 had rightly been overruled by the Court of Appeal in a subsequent decision on the interpretation of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1003), reg 26. [read post]