Search for: "Salazar v. District of Columbia" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2015, 7:23 am by Lorene Park
Given the apparent overreaction in immediately firing the employee, the court found a triable question on whether this was pretext for age discrimination (Salazar v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Gorsuch echoed a position taken earlier in 2010 by Scalia in Salazar v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:52 pm by David Kopel
 Inter alia, he created the “narrow individual right” theory of the Second Amendment, which was later popularized by historian Saul Cornell and earned four votes in the Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the February 17 conference)    Salazar-Limon v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am by INFORRM
Libel Decisions from Other Jurisdictions In Best v Weatherall 2010 BCCA 202 the British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed the claimant’s appeal in a libel action concerning a defamatory email and awarded damages of Can$3,000 (£2,000). [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:59 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
The decisive vote was Anthony Kennedy.In Second Amendment news, the Supreme Court will decide, by at least 7 votes, that the individual right to own weapons articulated in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Under the settlement filed in federal court in Columbia, S.C., Norfolk Southern will be required to pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, to be deposited in the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
District Judge Jose Martinez sent pieces of the permit review back to the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]