Search for: "Samsung Semiconductor Inc. "
Results 21 - 40
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
In Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:38 am
Hynix ranks No. 3 in NAND, behind Samsung and Japan's Toshiba Corp.The technology is believed to have been obtained by employees of the South Korean arm of Applied Materials Inc., a U.S. company that makes equipment for chip manufacturers including Samsung, and then passed on to Hynix, according to prosecutors.Santa Clara, California-based Applied Materials said it was aware of the actions by prosecutors and confirmed that its vice president and some employees of Applied… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:24 am
The latest patent suits cover a grab bag of products, from semiconductors to kitchen sink garbage disposals to invisible braces. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:29 pm
In the Order, ALJ Essex granted a joint motion filed by Complainant BTG International and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Apple, Inc., ASUStek Computer, Inc., ASUS Computer International, Inc., Dell Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 9:52 pm
., OSRAM GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH of Germany, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc., named by Complainants Samsung LED Co., Ltd. of Korea and Samsung LED America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia). [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:06 pm
” In opposition, Complainant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:38 am
Hynix ranks No. 3 in NAND, behind Samsung and Japan's Toshiba Corp.The technology is believed to have been obtained by employees of the South Korean arm of Applied Materials Inc., a U.S. company that makes equipment for chip manufacturers including Samsung, and then passed on to Hynix, according to prosecutors.Santa Clara, California-based Applied Materials said it was aware of the actions by prosecutors and confirmed that its vice president and some employees of… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:09 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified OSRAM GmbH of Germany, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH of Germany, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc. of Sunnyvale, California, and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. of Danvers, Massachusetts as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:16 pm
In Order No. 48 (dated March 23, 2010), ALJ Bullock granted Spansion’s motion for an order compelling Respondents Samsung Electronics Corporation, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce certain documents and other information relating to… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:34 pm
As to the economic prong, OSRAM states that its U.S. subsidiary OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc. of Sunnyvale, California (“OSRAM-OS U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:05 pm
According to the Order, Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) moved for leave to file a supplemental submission in support of their claim constructions regarding one of the patents-in-suit, the ‘877 patent. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:30 am
Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Nokia, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Apple Inc., PNY Technologies, Inc., Transcend Information Inc., Transcend Information, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:46 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung International, Inc. of San Diego, California Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc.… [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:13 pm
The Commission has identified the following as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California ASUStek Computer, Inc. of Taiwan ASUS Computer International of Fremont,… [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:56 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm
Lastly, the complaint states that Renesas once asserted a patent related to the ‘432 patent against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in the U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm
The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”), Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is OSRAM GmbH (“OSRAM”) and the Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung LED Co., Ltd., and Samsung LED America, Inc. [read post]
