Search for: "San Francisco Residence Club, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2010, 6:34 am
The California Chamber of Commerce fought the legislation, Assembly Bill 2279 by then-Assemblyman Mark Leno, D-San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of South San Francisco (September 18, 2017) 2017 Cal. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of South San Francisco (September 18, 2017) 2017 Cal. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
City and County of San Francisco (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 950: The lead agency correctly applied a Class 3 CEQA exemption to applications for permits to add wireless equipment throughout the City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm
Comm’r of Baseball, US 9th Cir. (1/15/15)Antitrust & Trade Litigation, Entertainment & Sports LawThis case arose when the Oakland Athletics wanted to move to the City of San Jose, but the City falls within the exclusive operating territory of the San Francisco Giants. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
**Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
City & County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 209. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Clarke alleged that PG&E and its predecessors left behind hazardous waste created by the Cannery manufactured gas plant (“Cannery MGP”) along the northern waterfront of San Francisco. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Clarke alleged that PG&E and its predecessors left behind hazardous waste created by the Cannery manufactured gas plant (“Cannery MGP”) along the northern waterfront of San Francisco. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, February 25, 2010 In accordance with the requirements of section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of a Settlement Agreement under sections 104, 106(a), 107, and 122 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9604, 9606(a), 9607, and 9622, between the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Colorado Bumper Exchange, Inc.… [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Lake Norconian Club Foundation v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Lake Norconian Club Foundation v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
” California – San Francisco Will Allow City Officials to Fundraise for Safe-Consumption Sites KQED – Sydney Johnson | Published: 3/21/2023 San Francisco leaders are making an exception to their own ethics policy so city officials can solicit donations for safe-consumption sites. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:05 am
Visit Legal Technology
Law.com ®
10 United Nations Plaza, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Click Here McWane Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
“It’s one of the most important threats to water quality right now,” said Miyoko Sakashita, a senior attorney at the group’s San Francisco office. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
The new VMT methodology will not be mandatory until July 1, 2020, unless implemented early by a lead agency, as has been done by the City of San Francisco. [read post]
