Search for: "San Martin v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
FACTUAL and PROCEDURAL HISTORY Miracle Star, owned and operated by Jeffrey and Staretta Moffatt, provides drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation services at a location in Lancaster, California. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
I haven't had a chance to fully digest the opinion yet, so in the meantime, go here for the thoughts of University of San Diego Law School Professor Shaun Martin at his California Appellate Report, and here for a summary and links from the California Blog of Appeal. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 12:16 pm
  In the meantime, go here for the thoughts of University of San Diego Law School Professor Shaun Martin at his California Appellate Report. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
Acker Jr. said he would appoint another attorney to handle the prosecution if Martin declined the court's request. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 12:26 pm
Superior Court (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 1086. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Court Clarifies 'Kangaroo' Comment The Recorder Retired San Joaquin County, Calif., Superior Court Judge Peter Saiers sounded almost smug upon learning three appellate justices had issued a ruling expressing their belief that he had, in fact, not called their court a "kangaroo court" during a 2005 hearing. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 10:30 am
San Diego Community College Dist. (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 977, 992; Johnson v. [read post]