Search for: "Sanchez v. State of Texas" Results 21 - 40 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2021, 9:10 am by [email protected]
Plea papers stated officers discovered heroin and methamphetamine in the vehicle Mendoza-Villegas and Sanchez-Mendoza were traveling in. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The Huffington Post, Cristian Farias reports that the brief filed by the United States last week in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:04 pm
In fact, in a pair of cases decided by our Court of Criminal Appeals fifteen years ago known as Sanchez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Texas, 2017)  Petitioner Yolanda Sanchez Tavarez (“Petitioner”) alleged Respondent Michael Jarrett (“Respondent”) wrongfully removed their six-year-old daughter, BLSJ, from Mexico to the United States on January 24, 2016. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:41 am
In a series of decisions in last decade – Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:20 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for, In civil cases, testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a... [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  A trial was held in State Court and the jury found Sanchez was grossly negligent and awarded Frederking $207,550.00 in punitive damages plus interest. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  A trial was held in State Court and the jury found Sanchez was grossly negligent and awarded Frederking $207,550.00 in punitive damages plus interest. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:09 pm
If so, then one would expect him to recognize that Texas courts are equally bound to follow the dictates of the Texas legislature, which has adopted legislation that prohibits Texas courts from considering procedurally defaulted claims in state habeas corpus proceedings. [read post]