Search for: "Sand v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 5:12 am
Alaska State Employees Association, involving whether the nation’s largest state is doing enough to protect the First Amendment rights of state employee union members. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Department of State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
From Doe v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Roberts's memo states the point clearly. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:41 am
” Huber v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
In Lyng v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
Smith (Federal Criminal Jurisdiction; Non-Indian Crimes in Indian Country) Sands, et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am
Doster, 23-154Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Sands, involving whether state university bias-response teams – and specifically, the bias-response team at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, better known as Virginia Tech – objectively chill students’ speech in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
Burns (1976), Branti v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:23 pm
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Myanmar and Ukraine v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:42 am
The case is Sheetz v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:52 am
Denezpi v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
In Chisholm v. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 10:54 am
” Transmission Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
Hamm v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
As I noted further above, I predicted that the shifting-sands case wouldn't make it to trial. [read post]
