Search for: "Sanofi US Services Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 5:29 am by Brenda Fulmer
The Zantac litigation effort involves several international drug companies, including Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals (based in Connecticut); Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation (German parent company); Sanofi US Services, Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 7:02 am by Fraud Fighters
” The allegations against Mylan were brought to court by pharmaceutical manufacturer Sanofi-Aventis US LLC under a provision of the False Claims Act that permits private qui tam whistleblowers to sue alleged wrongdoers on behalf of the federal government. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 7:02 am by Fraud Fighters
” The allegations against Mylan were brought to court by pharmaceutical manufacturer Sanofi-Aventis US LLC under a provision of the False Claims Act that permits private qui tam whistleblowers to sue alleged wrongdoers on behalf of the federal government. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm by Michael Sullivan
The Department of Justice announced the settlement on August 17, 2017, of two qui tam cases pending in the District of Massachusetts, United States, et al. ex rel. sanofi-aventis US LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm by Michael Sullivan
The Department of Justice announced the settlement on August 17, 2017, of two qui tam cases pending in the District of Massachusetts, United States, et al. ex rel. sanofi-aventis US LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:15 pm by Finch McCranie, LLP
The Department of Justice announced the settlement on August 17, 2017, of two qui tam cases pending in the District of Massachusetts, United States, et al. ex rel. sanofi-aventis US LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Beaulne, 2015 QCCS 1562 http://t.co/UyCkzy9qqE -> Guest commentary: Boston’s law firms are targets for cyber criminals http://t.co/37MCtBaeB7 -> Mandated “fair use” language has no place in trade promotion authority http://t.co/eVgq69wy8J -> Limitations on testimonial advertising does not infringe Charter rights College v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The possibility of litigation reform through bylaw revision received a substantial boost in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 9:14 pm by Mark Summerfield
  Methods of medical treatment came under scrutiny of the US Supreme Court in Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc and the Australian High Court in Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd (see High Court Rules Methods of Medical Treatment Patent-Eligible). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., [2008] 3 SCR 265 At the outset, it is appropriate to refer to the words of Judson J. for this Court in Commissioner of Patents v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
 Manitoba Telecom Services Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Wackenhut Services Inc., ___ F. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:49 am by Keith Lee
The people-search sites that receive the most visitors, according to comScore Inc., are Intelius Inc., Spokeo Inc. and 123people Internetservices GmbH. [read post]