Search for: "Sas v. State of Maryland" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2024, 10:56 am by Ilya Somin
(Joe Ravi/Wikimedia/CC-BY-SA 3.0)A few days ago, the Seattle University School of Law held a webinar on Trump v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:00 pm
He was indicted in 2007 in the Western District of Texas under U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:46 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
United States, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, November 16, 2012 Supreme Court Rules that Federal Law Preempts State Wrongful Death Lawsuit Over Asbestos Exposure: Kurns v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Somers, SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm by Marie Louise
Nuvasive, Inc., et. al (Docket Report) TransData – In smart meter patent suit TransData focuses antennae on Texas utility: TransData v Denton County Electric Cooperative (Green Patent Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court Maryland: Guess confusion isn’t such a big deal: Chattery Interanational v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
Baby you CA drive my KA General Court judgment in Ford Motor Company v OHIM, Alkar Automotive, SA. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 20 conference)   GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist)     Australia I thought cats were colour blind... [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am by Marie Louise
: Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer (World Trademark Review) (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) Copyright protection should apply to functions of computer programs, software company claims in ECJ case: SAS v World Programming (Out-Law) How do you solve a problem like Orphan Works? [read post]