Search for: "Sasse v. United States"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2018, 8:23 am
I have been asked to make the case for the confirmation of the President's nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to sit on the Supreme Court of the United States, without regard to the questions raised after the close of his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:58 am
One of the most notable ambiguities in Kavanaugh's record is the question of what he really thinks about the validity of the United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
Green card holders live in the United States as our neighbors and serve in our Armed Forces. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:34 am
Sasse to Attorney General Barr (Aug. 13, 2019). [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:34 pm
In Sass v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
Ben Sasse spoke for a number of the bill’s critics when he voiced concern that this provision would be unconstitutional as a matter of separation of powers: “Many of us think we are bound” by Justice Antonin Scalia’s lone dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:51 pm
Article II of the Constitution states that "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 10:42 pm
United States, 193 U.S. 197, 364 (1904). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Alessandro Maurini, The Missed Revolution at the Origins of the United States (2022). 6. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Students for Justice in Palestine at Univ. of Florida Denied Preliminary Injunction,
31 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
Rodrigues (see this Oct. 27, 2023 post for more on the background First Amendment issues): On October 24, 2023, less than three weeks after Hamas's horrific attack on Israel and a spike in antisemitic hate crimes throughout the United States, the Chancellor of the Board of Governors sent a memorandum to each university president in the State University System, including Defendant Ben Sasse, President of the University of Florida. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:06 am
That’s the position they took in Branham v. [read post]
