Search for: "Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan Beach" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Libertarians for Environmental Red Tape!
25 Aug 2011, 8:50 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
That’s why it was so odd to see the Pacific Legal Foundation advocating for more prolix environmental review in Save the Plastic Bag v. [read post]
Legal Planet - http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/
California Supreme Court Rejects Need for EIR and Supports Use of Common Sense
15 Jul 2011, 8:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 In Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Could standing save CEQA?
9 Apr 2012, 7:35 pm by Eric Biber
(Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
Legal Planet - http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/
Fall 2014 CEQA Roundup: Legislative and Regulatory Developments
16 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon and Matthew C. Henderson
City of Manhattan Beach (2011) 52 Cal.4th 155 did not dissuade subsequent (unsuccessful) suits in Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Big early-May calendar for still short-handed Supreme Court
7 Apr 2011, 5:52 pm by David Ettinger
Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
At the Lectern: Practicing Before the California Supreme Court - http://www.atthelectern.com/
2011 CEQA THIRD QUARTER UPDATE
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am by Abbott & Kindermann
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION/NEGATIVE DECLARATION **Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2011 CEQA ANNUAL UPDATE
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Napa); standing (Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Fourth District Reverses Judgment Granting Writ and Holds City of Upland’s MND For Warehouse Project Satisfies CEQA; Rejects Arguments That City’s Choice and Application of Quantitative GHG Significance Threshold Lacked Substantial Evidence Support
27 Sep 2024, 12:28 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing and quoting Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2010 MID-YEAR CEQA UPDATE
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am by Abbott & Kindermann
NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Are Courts Actively Limiting CEQA’s Scope In The Absence of Meaningful Legislative Reform?
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2010 CEQA UPDATE
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Filtering The CEQA Noise: First District Upholds Santa Rosa’s Negative Declaration For “Dream Center” Youth Housing Project, Holds Non-Expert Predictions Of Significant Noise Impacts Failed To Raise “Fair Argument” Supported By Substantial Evidence
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Manhattan Beach (2011) 52 Cal.4th 155 [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Upholds CEQA Categorical Exemption for Approval of Planned Parenthood Clinic in City of South San Francisco, Clarifies Implied Finding of No Exceptions is Analyzed for Record Support on Narrowest Possible Ground
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Upholds CEQA Categorical Exemption for Approval of Planned Parenthood Clinic in City of South San Francisco, Clarifies Implied Finding of No Exceptions is Analyzed for Record Support on Narrowest Possible Ground
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Supreme Engagement: CEQA’s Continuing Saga In California’s High Court
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Are Courts Actively Limiting CEQA’s Scope In The Absence of Meaningful Legislative Reform?
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Upholds Use of CEQA Writ Action Discovery Directed To Standing Issue, Affirms Trial Court’s Terminating Sanction For Plaintiff’s Failure To Comply
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  This important new decision is Creed-21 v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Standing Against Environmental Injustice: Some Thoughts On Facing The Need For CEQA Litigation Reform
18 Jul 2017, 9:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
., § 1086 [writ “must be issued upon the verified petition of the party beneficially interested”]; Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
January 31, 2010 – Environmental Law and Climate Change Law News, Vol. 2, No. 4
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
Taber Law Group - http://taberlaw.com