Search for: "Schalk v. State"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2010, 1:32 am
On 24 June, in Schalk and Kopf v Austria, the court decided that the convention does not yet require equal access. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
Then came a helpful explanation by guest contributor Christian Schalk as to why both companies should be so keen on retaining their right to use the name. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:20 am
The debate on conscience exemption, and its swift dismissal, reflects the changing relationship between Church and State in Ireland, and the waning influence of religion in matters of gender, sexuality and family.The passing of the Civil Partnership Bill follows on from the judgment that a Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (left) rendered on June 24th in Schalk and Kopf v Austria.The applicants had complained that the absence of same-sex marriage in Austria… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:22 am
The decision in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:15 pm
J M v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 2:09 am
It can be argued, that the Court’s rationale of Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm
Meanwhile, over in Strasbourg… A complaint of a very different type of discrimination, the refusal of a European Convention state to allow same-sex couples to marry, was recently decided by the Strasbourg Court in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
It is unlikely, however, that judges can be relied upon to step up on this issue in light of the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:46 am
Although the European Court of Human Rights this week struck a blow to the marriage equality campaign in Schalk and Kopf v Austria by holding that Article 12 of the ECHR (the right to marriage) did not oblige states to ensure marriage equality, the reasoning was based on the lack of a European consensus on the matter. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In that respect, as was explained in a previous post, the in the recent case of Schalk and Kopf v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights decided that at this point in time, Article 12 does not require States to allow same-sex marriage. [read post]
