Search for: "Scheffers v. Scheffers"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2014, 10:09 am
" and so forth, and you may build a compelling case.Polygraph evidence is generally not admissible in court, although in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:12 pm
Feinäugle, Commission v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:18 pm
Interested in Kiobel, Esther, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Elgin v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:57 am
(Since then, the Supremes have granted plenary review upon the Solicitor General’s cert petition in three cases — Scheffer, Clinton v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Scheffer Amicus brief of Professors of Legal History et al. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Scheffer Amicus brief of Professors of Legal History Bowoto v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Elgin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Mackey Davenport v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
Title: Schering Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm
There have been 9 plenary grants, six upon petition by a servicemember (Solorio, Weiss, Davis, Ryder, Edmond, Loving) and the most recent three upon petition by the SG (Scheffer, Clinton v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm
Goldsmith, and Scheffer) were all cases in which the SG sought cert. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
The case is Scheffer v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303 (1998). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:31 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:04 am
Scheffer, et al, v The Civil Service Employees Association, Local 828; Civil Service Employees Association; AFSCME, Local 1000, USCA, 2nd Circuit, Docket No. 07-3683-cv, Decided: June 28, 2010In considering an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York dismissing claims brought by public-sector employees who, as nonmembers of CSEA,* the union that represents them for collective-bargaining purposes, challenging the organizing fees… [read post]
