Search for: "Schism v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If the military will turn its weapons on the liberal politicians to prevent them from becoming despotic, then we do not need an armed citizenry to do that job.There are some rather elaborate scenarios in which one could imagine a schism within the military, with a few units siding with armed insurrectionists (and taking superior weapons with them as they join the rebellion) and fighting against the rest of the US armed forces. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Nixon and Kissinger negotiated the Paris Peace Accords and ended the Vietnam War for the United States in January 1973. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:37 am
On August 30, 2013, the Texas Supreme Court decided two cases involving the Episcopal Church of the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the United States Code, for example, there are exemptions: in food inspection laws, allowing the preparation of food in accordance with religious practices, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
” On this basis, the court concluded that the claimant’s alleged loss would have occurred in the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:21 am by Calvin Massey
Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States and Timberridge Presbyterian Church v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:34 am by John Steele
This question has polarized the criminal bar and bedeviled the academic community since the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:55 am by JB
The most obvious symbol of centralized interpretive authority is the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]