Search for: "Schumacher v. Schumacher" Results 21 - 40 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[iv] If there is no direct evidence of such an agreement, plaintiffs must show there was parallel action—where the defendants all acted in unison and the behavior “would probably not result from chance, coincidence, independent responses to common stimuli, or mere interdependence unaided by an advance understanding among the parties”[v]—and “plus factors” which show collusion. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that  test. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
   There are real difficulties with claim drafting for broad and limited claims:This was dealt with in the Amgen v Sanofi (PCSK 9 antibody) cases. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 am
Highlights of this part of the Congress, which addresses formal association business, were the selection of Thierry Calame (Lenz & Staehelin, Switzerland) as the new President, replacing Klaus Haft (Hoyng Rokh Monegier, Germany), the appointment of new Board member (Cordula Schumacher (Arnold Ruess, Germany) and the passing of an important motion that, in the event of Brexit, the statutes will be amended to enable the continued membership of UK lawyers (who may also participate in the… [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:59 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
” Arriving at the same conclusion on this issue as in Schumacher v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 11:58 am by Ilya Somin
The Murr family were the plaintiffs in Murr v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 5:16 am
The latest issue of Archiv des Völkerrechts (Vol. 54, no. 4, December 2016) is out. [read post]