Search for: "Scruggs v. Scruggs" Results 21 - 40 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2007, 7:24 pm
David Rossmiller:In yet another of the increasingly bizarre twists and turns in Katrina-spawned litigation, in USA v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 12:12 am
   The story has links to the Scruggs trial subpoena, as well as to other trial subpoenas including one issued to Johnny Jones, the attorney who is suing Scruggs for settlement fees in Jones v. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 3:02 am
  I took a look at the filings made on December 27 and 28 in the case, McIntosh v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:36 am
Read this passage from this recent Anita Lee story about the Jones v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:08 am
  Dickie Scruggs, Zach Scruggs, Backstrom, Balducci and Patterson allegedly met at the Scruggs Law Firm in Oxford to discuss how to influence the outcome of the Jones v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:00 am
Now, if you read this section of the transcript, it appears that Zach Scruggs did not know exactly what was meant by the Jones v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 7:42 am
Prosecutors accuse Scruggs of willfully violating the terms of federal... [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:08 am
A couple days after the breaking of the Scruggs scandal, it occurred to me that the Jones, Funderburg firm might move to amend the complaint in Jones v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 9:38 pm
  Judge Acker found Scruggs and the Rigsby sisters jointly and severally liable for civil contempt and a fine of $65,000 in the Renfroe v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 5:40 pm
(Page 42).* She says that Scruggs never had verbally agreed to indemnify her for any damages that she might be assessed in the Renfroe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:59 am
  Yesterday State Farm filed a motion to disqualify Scruggs in the McIntosh v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
Although the judge did allow that it might have looked bad that Scruggs defied the terms of the injunction, Judge Vinson cited two reasons why the charge of criminal contempt could not stand against Scruggs:First, the court had no jurisdiction because Scruggs was not active in the Renfroe v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 1:00 am
" This information is contained in a letter Scruggs filed as an an exhibit to supplemental briefing yesterday in the McIntosh v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:06 am
  This appears to be an effort to discover if the storyline is false that the sisters began talking with and working with Scruggs in February 2006, as Scruggs has stated in testimony in the Renfroe v. [read post]