Search for: "Seabrook v. Seabrook"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 3:47 am
Heinz Company v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:19 pm
Queens Co., 1998) (Milano, J.): Seabrook v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
Nola Spice Designs, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
The four-part test for determining inherent distinctiveness of trade dress was set forth in Seabrook v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am
Seabrook capitalized on both of these evidentiary regimes in The Magic Island. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
Dionne,Véronique Iezzoni, Simon Gagné, Sylvain Poirier, Philippe Tremblay, Patrick A. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
” The court explained that as it had previously ruled, “[w]here a pendent state claim turns on novel or unresolved questions of state law, especially where those questions concern the state’s interest in the administration of its government, principles of federalism and comity may dictate that these questions be left for decision by the state courts,” citing Seabrook v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:02 am
Nola Spice Designs, LLC v. [read post]
Precedential No. 31: TTAB Dismisses U. Alabama Opposition to HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA & Design for Clothing
29 Jul 2013, 2:51 am
Bryant, Jr. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:47 am
Of course, if the mark is a product design, then under Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:33 am
That determination required application of the CCPA's test set out in Seabrook Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
The Appeals Court explains that NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, operates the Seabrook, New Hampshire, Unit 1 nuclear power plant, which provides a significant portion of the baseload electric power used in New England. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm
For publication opinions today (5): In Seabrook, Dieckmann & Naville, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:24 am
That distinction is legally important because of the Supreme Court ruling in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Union presence during an interrogation of a unit member by the appointing authority Seabrook v City of New York, 57 AD3d 232 Norman Seabrook, individually and as President of the Correction Officers' Benevolent Association, challenged the policy of not allowing an employee to consult with a union representative after a question is posed and before an answer must be given, at an interrogation conducted pursuant to [New York City] Mayoral Executive Order No. 16. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:16 am
In PolyOne Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
The opinion in Farris v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
., et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:50 am
Chronic absenteeism policy - multiple penalties challenged Seabrook v New York, NYS Sup. [read post]
