Search for: "Sealed Defendant 7 v. USA" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 21 July 2022 the Court of Appeal (Arnold, Dingemans and Warby LJJ) heard the defendant’s appeal in the case of Riley v Murray against the judgment of Nicklin J dated 20 December 2021 ([2021] EWHC 3437 (QB)) in which damages of £10,000 were awarded to the claimant. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
The same thing's repeated almost verbatim in Section 2.03, illustration 7, so the draft really wants to make this point. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
“ The letter agreement provides that the payment terms were to be the same as those set forth in the most recent Capital One/Mandiant SOW dated January 7, 2019. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
§ 102(b).[7]  These defenses, which had to be shown by clear and convincing evidence, protected not only the accused infringer but an entire industry, since the asserted claim was invalid and thus no longer usable. [read post]