Search for: "Sealed Third-Party Defendant"
Results 21 - 40
of 715
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Third, the documents Plaintiff seeks to seal are currently available in the public record in Phoenix Capital Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 4:26 pm
Defendant has also argued for the continued sealing of this matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
June 9, 2009) - a study in stupidity or audacity - the third-party petitioner, a defendant in a civil suit commenced by Watkins, sought access to the portions of Watkins' presentence report dealing with his financial situation. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
The post Court Rejects Defendant's Request to Seal 9-Year-Old Libel Case appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:08 pm
By agreement of the parties, the defendant sought to support the motion with certain exhibits filed under seal, or redacted, and the plaintiff did likewise in opposition to the summary judgment motion. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
If you must be near the accuser, due to employment or child custody arrangements, try to ensure a third party is always present so that he or she can act as a witness. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
First, it is irrelevant that no third party has asked to unseal the documents. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 5:20 am
A third party, such as the media, might have the motivation to challenge a decision to seal. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
The Settlement Agreement includes reference to personal identifiers of third parties, although they are not signatories to the agreement itself. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:48 am
Sealed Defendant, the Second Circuit discussed the standard governing the use of pseudonyms in civil litigation. 537 F.3d 185, 189-90 (2d Cir.2008). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 10:17 am
While much of the information that the parties sought to file under seal in connection with [plaintiff's] motion for preliminary injunction and [defendant's] motion to stay [pending appeal] may be sealable under the more pliant 'good cause' standard, hardly any of it, save for the exception of some limited third-party source code, satisfies the more stringent 'compelling reasons' standard. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am
The court notes that there is a strong presumption in American law that lawsuits are to be litigated in public, with the parties identified; sealing and pseudonymity are fairly rare exceptions (especially in federal court). [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
" This strikes me as likely unconstitutional, because of its substantive scope, because it was entered as an ex parte TRO with no opportunity for the defendants to be heard, and because it purports to restrict the free speech rights of third parties who also had no opportunity to be heard. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
Therefore, filing the documents under seal and serving them on the defendants has the same effect as disclosing documents to a third party and thus waiving the privilege. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
This is at least the third patent infringement lawsuit involving CSP and some or all of the Defendants. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:13 pm
Third, as the District Court emphasized, it is “hard to discern any purpose, other than general intimidation, for [Defendant's] citation of [a] criminal statute in an official communication to a citizen, even one represented by counsel. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:14 am
In Judge Rogers’ view, “Because the constitutional right of access belongs to third parties, laws governing the relationship between litigating parties are of little consequence to the application of Press-Enterprise II here. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
I therefore filed an objection to the motion to seal (as third parties are allowed to do, because sealing implicates the public's right of access); and I'm pleased to say that on Friday Chief Judge Philip A. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:11 am
A party's unilateral designation of a document as confidential under a protective order does not, in and of itself, justify a seal ….. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
A motion to intervene is the proper tool for third parties to challenge a sealing order, and Volokh has Article III standing to intervene "The courts have widely recognized that the correct procedure for a nonparty to challenge a protective order is through intervention for that purpose. [read post]
