Search for: "Sealing Order(s) for Public Filing"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2019, 9:51 pm
But Plaintiffs’ desire to confound the public cannot trump the public’s First Amendment right of access. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:54 pm
Sealed excerpts that exceed 300 pages shall be filed in multiple volumes.(2) Hearings are Presumed Open to the Public Absent an Order from this CourtEffective February 1, 2016, this Court clarifies its presumption that all hearings will be open tothe public absent an express order from this Court to the contrary. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm
Paterno’s will and all related court filings have been ordered sealed from public view. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm
§ 132–1.4(k) (providing that an indictment is a “public records and may be withheld only when sealed by court order”). [read post]
23 May 2015, 8:14 pm
As I previously noted in this post, yesterday the Second Circuit issued an order in a case of public interest stating that the court's opinion was filed under seal and would be issued next Tuesday, possibly in redacted form after the parties have received an opportunity to suggest any desired redactions. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:28 pm
The public and the press have First Amendment and common-law rights to access court records, and yet surveillance matters filed in the federal courts often remain under seal well past any need for secrecy - in effect, indefinitely. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:47 pm
Special Grand Jury’s report ordered sealed after public officer who was the target of the investigation resigned from public officeMatter of Seventh Report of Seneca County Special Grand Jury of Jan. 2007, 60 AD3d 1446Seneca County Court Justice Dennis F. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 6:07 am
File the expungement or sealing petition with the appropriate clerk's office and pay the required filing fees. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 6:04 am
Colorado Dep't of Human Services, decided June 4 by the Tenth Circuit (Judge Joel Carson, joined by Judges Scott Matheson & Mary Briscoe), upheld the dismissal of a pro se lawsuit, but said this about the plaintiff's motion to seal: In its final order the district court restricted the public's access to the filings and orders on its docket and redacted McCoy's address. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
Lawyers who motion to seal court records and files must demonstrate to the court and the opposition a very strong reason why public access should be denied. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
So now parties need to file a motion or an application for an order sealing the record, and the court may or may not grant it. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 11:40 am
First, the CRC state that no file can be placed under seal without a court order. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 11:40 am
First, the CRC state that no file can be placed under seal without a court order. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 3:30 am
This post is somewhat related, pertaining to Allstate’s post-trial efforts to seal discovery it produced pre-trial under a trade secret/confidential protective order and was introduced by the insured at trial without objection from Allstate. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 11:29 am
It’s important to note that laws vary from state to state in regards to getting a record sealed, and it’s very important that you research your local laws in order to figure out if and how you would be able to seal yours. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
Filing under seal protects the documents from view of the public. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:28 am
The article opened:A federal judge's recent unsealing of a secret government request for electronic monitoring shines a light on how such applications are kept hidden from the public long after criminal cases that result from them are closed.The Sept. 2 order, by U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Domenico's order Thursday in Nichols v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
Subsequently, plaintiff's counsel moved for entry of a consent decree to be filed under seal. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 9:09 am
Accordingly, the Court's sealing of its Decisions and Orders on the docket, and even directing search engines to remove them, would be pointless if done to remove public information about them. [read post]