Search for: "Self v. Louisiana et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Warrior et al conceded that its claims before the court were dependent upon the TITAN’s status as a vessel. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represented Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company et al. as an amicus in support of the petitioner in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
Actavis 12-416Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, also represented Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company et al. as an amicus in support of the petitioner in this case.Issue: Whether reverse-payment agreements are per se lawful unless the underlying patent litigation was a sham or the patent was obtained by fraud (as the court below held), or instead are presumptively anticompetitive and… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am
Actavis 12-416Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, also represented Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company et al. as an amicus in support of the petitioner in this case.Issue: Whether reverse-payment agreements are per se lawful unless the underlying patent litigation was a sham or the patent was obtained by fraud (as the court below held), or instead are presumptively anticompetitive and… [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, also represented Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company et al. as an amicus in support of the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
Rahman, et al. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
Rahman, et al. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
The original article on which this revised version is based was originally written before the initial decisio in FDIC v Perry was reported (about which decision, refer here). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the American Civil Rights UnionAmicus brief of the National Association of Home Builders et al. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:34 am
Zurich American Insurance Company et. al v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
Bennett (10-238) and McComish, et al., v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Zurich American Insurance Company et. al v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Provincial Government of MarinduqueDocket: 09-944Issue(s): Whether federal courts have jurisdiction to rule on a case that involves potential foreign policy issues because a foreign government is involved.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' supplemental briefPetitioners' reply Title: Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen – Self Insurers Fund v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
As our readers know, we have been following the developments in Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen – Self Insured Fund v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
The problem was self-reported by the company, and a proposed consent decree was signed by company officials last December and by a U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
