Search for: "Sellers v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 1,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2010, 8:21 am by buslawblogger
The North Dakota Supreme Court recently determined in State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
In a huge win for consumers in New Jersey and throughout the United States, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided today in the case of Real v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
  Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
  Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 1:26 pm
Using these cases as precedent, the court noted that the defendant's auction listing stated he would ship anywhere in the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm by Buckingham
North Dakota that a state cannot require an out-of-state retailer (remote seller) to collect sales or use tax unless the retailer has an in-state physical presence. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm by Shannon O'Hare
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA On 20 December 2020 Congress approved the “second-largest economic relief package in US history” of USD 900bn (the first tracking back to the beginning of the pandemic in March, securing USD 2.2tn). [read post]