Search for: "Sentelle" Results 21 - 40 of 443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 pm by Seth Davis
Judge Sentelle concurred in the judgment to emphasize his “hope that [a] full examination of the evidence . . . would be undertaken on remand. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm by Ryan Mulvey
Judge Sentelle concurred in the judgment, agreeing that the government had not yet met its burden, but expressing some skepticism of the panel’s interpretation of the word “commercial. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 10:50 pm by Hyland Hunt
Judge Sentelle concurred in the judgment, agreeing that the government had not yet met its burden, but expressing some skepticism of the panel’s interpretation of the word “commercial. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 9:33 am by Aaron L. Nielson
Here is how Judge Henderson opened her opinion (joined by Judges Walker and Sentelle): Finally, we have Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:32 pm by Amy Howe and James Romoser
 “The mere fact that individual members of Congress may have political motives as well as legislative ones is of no moment,” Judge David Sentelle wrote for the panel. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 2:27 pm by Ilya Somin
The decision was written by prominent conservative Judge David Sentelle, who reasoned as follows: [T]he House is suing to remedy an institutional injury to its own institutional power to prevent the expenditure of funds not authorized. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:45 am by Hyland Hunt
Circuit (Sentelle, J.) therefore dismissed the mandamus petition as moot (rejecting petitioner’s argument that this was mere “voluntary cessation” on the government’s part), as well as for lack of ripeness and standing. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
Judge Rao wrote for the panel, which included Chief Judge Srinivasan and Senior Judge Sentelle. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 1:53 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
” Constellium — per Judge Wilkins, dissent by Judge Sentelle — concerns what happens when an employee engages in potentially harrassing conduct as part of a labor fight over overtime pay. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:59 pm by Law Offices of Thomas L. Gallivan, PLLC
The three-judge panel, according to Reuters, included Neomi Rao, Sri Srinivasan and David Sentelle. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 3:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Dep't of Treasury by Judge David Sentelle, joined by Judge Robert Wilkins and in large part by Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson: The Chairman of the United States House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means filed a statutory request for documents from the Department of the Treasury related to then-President Donald J. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:14 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
On remand, the agency reached the same conclusion, and this time, the Court — Judge Rao, joined by Judges Rogers and Sentelle — upheld the FERC’s decision. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:28 am by Seth Davis
Senior Judge Sentelle wrote the opinion for the Court, which was joined by Judge Tatel, who assumed senior status after the case was argued, and Judge Pillard. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:23 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Apparently the NYT chose to include senior circuit judges in its count, which adds two Democratic appointees (Tatel and Edwards) and four Republican appointees (Silberman, Ginsburg, Sentelle, and Randolph). [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 4:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
OMB, Judge Rao (joined by Judges Srinivasan and Sentelle) agreed with the district court that federal agencies do not exercise the requisite degree of control over internet browsing histories for the histories to constitute agency records subject to FOIA disclosure. [read post]
On October 11, 2019, the a three judge panel consisting of Judges Pillard, Edwards, and Sentelle of the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:06 pm by Josh Blackman
There are four senior status judges appointed by Presidents Reagan and Bush 41: Silberman, Ginsburg, Sentelle, and Randolph. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 8:23 pm by Ilya Somin
" Judge Sentelle's decision holding that the House of Representatives had standing to challenge the border wall funding diversion is an important precedent making it easier for either  house of Congress to challenge future executive intrusions on its authority. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:35 am by Ilya Somin
Ending the case would leave in place several lower court decisions ruling against the legality of the funding diversion, as well as a valuable DC Circuit decision ruling (written by famed conservative Judge David Sentelle) that the House of Representatives has standing to challenge it. [read post]