Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 21 - 40
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
Most people assume that the leading argument Seth and I have advanced is "Officers of the United. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I are the primary proponents of the former argument, and Kurt Lash is the primary proponent of the latter argument. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
Anderson strongly suggests a Trump victory on the grounds advanced heroically by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, a New York native who teaches law at Maynooth University School of Law in Kildare, Ireland, has been thinking and writing about some of the issues around Section 3 since at least 2014, including his view that the president is not “an officer of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[Not exactly what I expected, but a very rewarding experience. ] As regular readers will know, Seth Barrett Tillman and I have spent untold hours over the past six months, and really past three years, on Section 3. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
[A reply to Prof. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:19 am
Seth Barrett Tillman) is available here.The post C-SPAN Washington Journal Appearance on the Trump Section 3 Case appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Griswold On Behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman (1/9/24). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Michael Luttig, who served on the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
Both Seth Barrett Tillman and I will be attending. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:19 am
Great Charlie Savage NYT profile of Seth Barrett Tillman, brainchild behind the odd “officer of the United States” argument taking center stage at the Trump disqualification oral argument tomorrow at the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm
Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II”: Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Since the outset of the Section 3 litigation, those seeking to disqualify Trump from the ballot have made two primary arguments concerning the Appointments Clause. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am
See Seth Barrett Tillman, Why Our Next President May Keep His or Her Senate Seat: A Conjecture on the Constitution's Incompatibility Clause, 4 Duke J. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 7:38 am
Congratulations to Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman for unearthing the Louisville Daily Journal's series of pieces claiming, contrary to what President Andrew Johnson said about his job description, that Johnson was not an officer of the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
